翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ "O" Is for Outlaw
・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap.
・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord
・ "Oh Yeah!" Live
・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975)
・ "P" Is for Peril
・ "Pimpernel" Smith
・ "Polish death camp" controversy
・ "Pro knigi" ("About books")
・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards
・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen
・ "Q" Is for Quarry
・ "R" Is for Ricochet
・ "R" The King (2016 film)
・ "Rags" Ragland
・ ! (album)
・ ! (disambiguation)
・ !!
・ !!!
・ !!! (album)
・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!!
・ !Action Pact!
・ !Arriba! La Pachanga
・ !Hero
・ !Hero (album)
・ !Kung language
・ !Oka Tokat
・ !PAUS3
・ !T.O.O.H.!
・ !Women Art Revolution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

consequentialist libertarianism : ウィキペディア英語版
consequentialist libertarianism

Consequentialist libertarianism (also known as libertarian consequentialism〔Yeager, Leland B. Ethics As Social Science: The Moral Philosophy of Social Cooperation. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2001. p. 283〕) refers to the libertarian position that is supportive of a free market and strong private property rights only on the grounds that they bring about favorable consequences, such as prosperity or efficiency. What consequentialist libertarians advocate is derived simply through cost–benefit calculation, taking a broad account of consequences.〔Miron, Jeffrey A. Libertarianism: from A to Z. Basic Books, 2010. p.39〕 It is contrasted with deontological libertarianism, also known as "natural-rights libertarianism," which considers the initiation of force and fraud to be immoral, regardless of consequences.〔Bradford. R. W. 2008. The Two Libertarianisms. Liberty (1987). Liberty Foundation.〕 Unlike deontological libertarians, consequentialist libertarians do not necessarily see all cases of initiation of force as immoral and never see it as ''inherently'' immoral (i.e., they do not express a belief in natural rights). Rather, their position is that political and economic liberty lead to the best consequences in the form of happiness and prosperity, and for that reason alone it should be supported. (Some libertarians may have a conception of libertarianism that is a hybrid of consequentialism and deontology).〔
Unlike deontological libertarians, consequentialist libertarians advocate actions they believe bring about favorable consequences regardless of whether these constitute initiation of force.〔Charles Murray, David Friedman, David Boaz, and R.W. Bradford. What's Right vs. What Works. Liberty. January 2005, Volume 19, Number 1, Page 31. ()〕〔Barnett, Randy E., "(The Moral Foundations of Modern Libertarianism )." Varieties of Conservatism in America, Peter Berkowitz, ed., Hoover Press, 2004.〕 For example, unlike deontological libertarians, in addition to support for involuntary taxes, some consequentialists libertarians support eminent domain〔Coercion vs. Consent" Richard Epstein, Randy Barnett, David Friedman & James P. Pinkerton. Reason Magazine. March 2004〕 Particular views vary among consequentialist libertarians, with political theorist David D. Friedman supporting a consequentialist form of anarcho-capitalism where the content of law is bought and sold rather there being an established legal code forbidding initiation of force.〔Friedman, David. The Machinery of Freedom: Guide to a Radical Capitalism. Harper & Row. pp. 127–128〕
==Notable consequentialist libertarians==
Milton Friedman,〔http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PaN9M4WwHw#t=68〕 David D. Friedman, Peter Leeson, Ludwig von Mises,〔Edward W.Younkins MISES' UTILITARIANISM AS SOCIAL COOPERATION〕 and Friedrich Hayek〔Hayek's Constitution of Liberty: Ethical Basis of the Juridical Framework of Individual Liberty – Leonard P. Liggio, Literature of Liberty, Winter 1982, vol. 5, No. 4 ()〕〔Gray, John N. "F. A. Hayek and the Rebirth of Classical Liberalism" 1982〕〔Alan O. Ebenstein. Friedrich Hayek: A Biography p. 383〕 are consequentalist libertarians.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「consequentialist libertarianism」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.